Investigating the key indicators of implementing car paint quality management in the automotive industry

Authors

  • Aboutaleb Ghahremani * Master of Payame Noor University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
  • Amirmahan Mohseni BS student in Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59615/ijie.1.3.65

DOR:

https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27831906.2021.1.3.6.2

Keywords:

Car paint quality, Critical quality indicators, Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making

Abstract

With the increasing development of science and technology, economics and industry have gone beyond their traditional framework and are becoming more and more knowledge-based every day. In this regard, identifying and reviewing key indicators in different sectors of industry as well as evaluating and prioritizing these factors are the most important optimization tools in the field of growth and development of companies. The study of how these tools affect their development and identify the factors affecting their accurate implementation in the field of car paint quality is the subject of this article. After extensive review of existing studies in this field and reviewing the opinions of experts, key influential factors were identified and using the ideas of experts, they were modified in accordance with the conditions of the country and placed in a suitable frame. These critical indicators were examined using Fuzzy AHP method and their importance was discovered within the process. This model was investigated and tested in Iran Khodro Company, using the analysis of the results the importance of the elements was figured out. Finally, using the obtained results from the analysis, the value of optimal implementation in different parts of the industry was examined.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• Aliahmadi, A., Jafari-Eskandari, M., Mozafari, M., & Nozari, H. (2013). Comparing artificial neural networks and regression methods for predicting crude oil exports. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 5(2), 40-58.

• Aliahmadi, A., Sadeghi, M. E., Nozari, H., Jafari-Eskandari, M., & Najafi, S. E. (2015). Studying key factors to creating competitive advantage in science Park. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (pp. 977-987). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47241-5_82

• Elyasi, M., Khosropour, H., Rahimian, N., Sadeghi, M., Nozari, H. (2021). Investigating and Prioritizing the Factors Affecting on levels of Learning Technology in the Enterprise (Empirical Evidence of Isfahan Enterprises). Innovation Management and Operational Strategies, (), -. doi: 10.22105/imos.2021.289916.1113

• Fallah, M., Sadeghi, M. e., & Nozari, H. (2021). Quantitative analysis of the applied parts of Internet of Things technology in Iran: an opportunity for economic leapfrogging through technological development. Science and Technology Policy Letters

• Khajezadeh Dezfuli, H., & Nozari, H. (2021). Modeling and Comparison of Fuzzy and Non-Fuzzy Multi-Objective Evolution Optimization Portfolios in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of New Researches in Mathematics.

• Luo, J. M., Fan, Y., & Shang, Z. (2021). Analysis of Critical Success Factors for Entertainment Tourism Destinations: The Supply Perspective. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 1-24.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2021.1958126

• Mohammadi, H., Ghazanfari, M., Nozari, H., & Shafiezad, O. (2015). Combining the theory of constraints with system dynamics: A general model (case study of the subsidized milk industry). International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 10(2), 102-108.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2014.920123

• Mousakhani, M., Saghafi, F., Hasanzade, M., & sadeghi, m. e. (2020). Presenting a policy framework for high technologies, using Identification of factors affecting the development of a technological innovation system with meta-synthesis. Journal of Decisions and Operations Research, 5(1), 13-27. doi:10.22105/dmor.2020.221888.1138

• Mousakhani, M., Saghafi, F., Hasanzadeh, M., & Sadeghi, M. E. (2020). Proposing Dynamic Model of Functional Interactions of IoT Technological Innovation System by Using System Dynamics and Fuzzy DEMATEL. Journal of Operational Research and Its Applications, 17(4), 1-21. Retrieved from http://jamlu.liau.ac.ir/article-1-1869-en.html

• Nouri, F. (2021). The relationship between management ability and investment opportunities with an emphasis on the role of political connection. International Journal of Innovation in Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 1(1), 65-82.Doi: https://doi.org/10.52547/ijimes.1.1.65

• Nozari, H., Sadeghi, M. E., Eskandari, J., & Ghorbani, E. (2012). Using integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to explore the impact of knowledge management tools in staff empowerment (Case study in knowledge-based companies located on science and technology parks in Iran). International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 4(2), 75-92.

• Pimentel, L., & Major, M. (2016). Key success factors for quality management implementation: evidence from the public sector. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(9-10), 997-1012.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1055239

• Sadeghi, M. E., & Sadabadi, A. A. (2015). Evaluating Science Parks Capacity to Create Competitive Advantages: Comparison of Pardis Technology Park and Sheikh Bahaei Science and Technology Park in Iran. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 12(06), 1550031. doi:10.1142/S0219877015500315

• SADEGHI, M. E., SADABADI, A. A., MIRZAMOHAMMADI, S., & MAHDAVI MAZDEH, M. (2014). DETERMINING THE PRIORITIES IN SCIENCE PARKS BY USING FUZZY DEMATEL CASE STUDY OF SHEIKH-BAHAI SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARK. ROSHD-E-FANAVARI, 11(41), -. Retrieved from https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=424628

• Sadeghi, M., Nozari, H., Khajezadeh Dezfoli, H., Khajezadeh Dezfoli, M., Zhou, Z. (2021). Ranking of different of investment risk in high-tech projects using TOPSIS method in fuzzy environment based on linguistic variables. Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications, (), -. Doi: 10.22105/jfea.2021.298002.1159

• Seetharaman, A., Sreenivasan, J., & Boon, L. P. (2006). Critical success factors of total quality management. Quality and quantity, 40(5), 675-695.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-1097-2

• Shirazi, F. (2021). Managing portfolio’s risk for improving quality in a project-oriented manufacture. International Journal of Innovation in Engineering, 1(1), 55-63.Doi: https://doi.org/10.52547/ijie.1.1.48

• Teltumbde, A. (2000). A framework for evaluating ERP projects. International journal of production research, 38(17), 4507-4520.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540050205262

• Wu, H. H., Tang, Y. T., & Shyu, J. W. (2010). An integrated approach of Kanos model and importance-performance analysis in identifying key success factors. African Journal of Business Management, 4(15), 3238-3250.Doi: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM.9000076

• Yadav, N., Shankar, R., & Singh, S. P. (2021). Critical success factors for lean six sigma in quality 4.0. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-06-2020-0099

Downloads

Published

2021-10-07

How to Cite

Ghahremani, A., & Mohseni, A. (2021). Investigating the key indicators of implementing car paint quality management in the automotive industry . International Journal of Innovation in Engineering, 1(3), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.59615/ijie.1.3.65

Issue

Section

Original Research